Or, as it should have been named, Alice In Underland. But that’s just my opinion.
I know that there has been some debate about whether or not it was a good idea for “them” to make this movie as a sequel that takes place years later, as opposed to sticking with the original story. Let me ask you this. What happens in the original version of the story? If you know the answer, then why the hell would you want to see it again? I think it was more interesting to add more characters and a less predictable ending than telling the same story for the 300th time.
I won’t bother with a synopsis. If you don’t know what happened in the original, then you are a movie/literary noob. So what the hell are you reading my blog for? Stop reading this immediately and start your film education. All you need is a video store rental card and a couple of hours a day. After a couple of years, you too could be a movie snob, looking down on those who think it’s a good idea to go see the same movie 4 times in theaters instead of diversifying and watching something that makes you have to use your brain. Ok, I’m done. Moving on…..